Monday 23 April 2012

Catholics v Protestants? Old Firm complexities


The internet and rapid growth in social media networks in recent years has provided an ever increasing platform and audience for pretty much anyone to publicly express their opinions. Strict actions have been taken in the past 12 months or so to clamp down on offensive ‘tweets’ and Facebook posts. In Scotland, the whole Old Firm, sectarian and religious imbroglio is especially poignant of late. Social media has made the whole, previously faceless issue, significantly more transparent and identifiable. As an avid user of a Twitter, Facebook and Blogspot – in no particular order – it hasn’t gone unnoticed that there is a growing trend for overtly bigoted, provocative and biased posts – especially around Old Firm games, or whenever either half of the old firm is subject to intense media scrutiny.

Of course, this rivalry has always been there. I do not suggest that social media has strengthened the loathing each sets of fans have for one and other, but it certainly has made it more observable. Through history, Scotland, and Glasgow, has been embroiled in religious divide. It is hardly clandestine that Celtic is a club steeped Irish and Catholic tradition and Rangers, and the majority of their fans, are undeniably associated with Protestantism. The rivalry, despite being especially fierce in a sporting sense, is intensified by the infusion of religion, Northern Irish politics and the Irish diaspora associated with Celtic FC. The issue that has struck me of late is the juxtaposition of Catholics versus Protestants. Of course, this is a general view but it is a theme I have witnessed on countless occasions in disputes between either sets of fans.

The issue I have with this division, for the sake of this article, is not concerned with moral issues or who’s right and who’s wrong, it is with regards to the contemporary relevance that the religious divide has in today’s society. I would argue that the rivalry has been confused over time. Scottish society, in general, has seen a dramatic decrease in religious significance in people’s lives. Far fewer people attend churches or strictly belong to a religion than they have done previously, yet the emphasis for the rivalry continues to be of religious derivation.

The terms used by either sets of fans to describe their rivals in an abusive fashion are, more often than not, aimed at the religious beliefs of the opposition. There are certain words that have been identified to be the most offensive that are repeatedly heard in songs, stadiums and most recently, seen on social media. The Scottish government is feverously endeavouring to outlaw ‘sectarianism’ and bigotry, which such discourse is labelled.

How relevant are these words, though? How many Rangers fans, for example, who claim to be Protestant, fully comprehend the term? If a questionnaire on the reformation to be handed round Ibrox, would the results indicate an enlightened fan base? And history seems to have been misconstrued, too. The majority of Rangers fans are aware of the existence of William, Prince Of Orange, but would they be equally aware of John Calvin, Martin Luther or John Knox; men to which their protestant beliefs are mostly owed. At the same time, how many Celtic fans are in mass every weekend? Are the tricolour waving supporters of Irish origin and is the crucifix around their necks a symbol of their catholic faith or a deliberately selected symbol to given them instantaneous association with Celtic FC.

Doubtless, a lot of the beliefs and hatred for their rivals is ingrained in them from an early age. Beliefs are often passed down from father to son, strengthened by a social circle and then reaffirmed by selecting to be an active member of either supporters club. I just feel the whole thing has a 'Chinese Whispers' like effect. People know, roughly, what they are meant to believe in and meant to be against but it’s been muddled through time. How can you be offended by something you don’t understand? Or offend someone you don’t fully comprehend?

Effectively, it’s all part of a need for belonging: to be given a sense of identity. Subscribing to ‘sectarianism’ helps to strengthen your belonging to a club. Fans of either club who support the team but not necessarily the tradition that goes with it are often ostracized or trivialised; their support is less significant.

The rivalry was, and continually will be, regarded as a religious one. However, it is becoming more outdated and mythical with every new generation that carries it on.

Darren Dalrymple

https://twitter.com/#!/DarrenDalrymple

No comments:

Post a Comment